Slipping on ice in Ottawa without proper winter footwear does not mean you lose your right to sue. However, under the Ontario Negligence Act, the insurance company will argue “contributory negligence,” which can legally reduce your final financial settlement by a percentage reflecting your share of the blame.
Navigating the Greater Ottawa Area between November and April is notoriously treacherous. Between freezing rain, heavy snowfall, and the freeze-thaw cycle, sidewalks and parking lots can quickly become sheets of black ice. While property owners are legally required to clear and salt their walkways, pedestrians also have a basic responsibility to dress for the weather. If you slip and fall while walking through the ByWard Market in high heels, or step out of your car in Kanata wearing smooth-soled dress shoes, you might assume you have no legal case. This is a common and costly misconception.
In Ontario, personal injury law does not view accidents in strictly black-and-white terms. 🔍 Even if your footwear was completely inappropriate for an Ottawa winter, the property owner may still be primarily at fault for failing to maintain a safe environment under the Occupiers’ Liability Act. However, the defence lawyers will aggressively use your choice of footwear to argue “contributory negligence.” This legal concept allows a judge to split the blame between you and the property owner, which directly impacts the final amount of money you take home.
Step-by-Step Process: Handling Contributory Negligence
If you suspect your footwear will be an issue in your claim, honesty and preservation of evidence are your best strategies. Here is how a skilled personal injury law firm will handle the situation and protect your payout.
Step 1: Preserve Your Footwear Immediately
Do not throw away the shoes or boots you were wearing when you fell. 👞 Place them in a plastic bag and store them safely in your closet. The insurance company’s defence lawyer will almost certainly demand to inspect your footwear during the discovery phase. If you throw them away, the defence can argue “spoliation of evidence” and claim you were wearing highly dangerous shoes, making your case much harder to win.
Step 2: Prove the Primary Negligence of the Occupier
Before negotiating your share of the blame, your lawyer must first prove the property owner was negligent. This means gathering weather records, hiring property maintenance experts, and demanding the winter maintenance logs from the snowplough contractor. If the contractor completely failed to salt the icy walkway for 48 hours, their gross negligence will often overshadow your footwear choices.
Step 3: Negotiate the Apportionment of Liability
During mediation or settlement discussions, your lawyer and the insurance adjuster will argue over percentages. 💬 The adjuster might argue that your smooth-soled sneakers make you 50% at fault for the fall. Your lawyer will counter-argue, perhaps referencing past Ontario court decisions, to negotiate that number down to 10% or 15%, ensuring you retain the vast majority of your compensation.
Step 4: Calculate the Final Financial Settlement
Once a percentage of fault is agreed upon, the math is applied to your total damages. For example, if your total claim for pain and suffering and lost wages is valued at $100,000 CAD, but you agree to accept 20% contributory negligence for wearing inadequate winter boots, your final payout is mathematically reduced by 20%. You would receive a cheque for $80,000 CAD.
How Much Does it Cost in Ottawa?
Fighting allegations of contributory negligence requires strong legal representation, but it does not require you to pay hourly legal fees. Local law firms operate on a structure that allows you to pursue justice without upfront financial risk.
| Legal Process or Deduction | Estimated Financial Impact (CAD) |
|---|---|
| Personal Lawyer Retainer | $0 upfront (Contingency fee basis) |
| Contributory Negligence Reduction | Typically 10% to 30% of the gross settlement |
| Expert Property Maintenance Report | $2,000 – $4,000 (Funded by your law firm) |
| Typical Lawyer Contingency Fee | Roughly 30% of the final net settlement |
- Expert Witnesses: Your law firm may hire an engineering expert to examine your shoes and the friction coefficient of the ice. If the ice was so slippery that even premium winter boots would have failed, your lawyer can argue your footwear was completely irrelevant to the fall.
- The 60-Day Rule: Remember, if you fell on snow or ice on private property, Ontario law requires you to serve a formal written notice to the occupier within exactly 60 days, regardless of what shoes you were wearing.
- Municipal Sidewalks: If you fell on a city-owned sidewalk, you only have 10 days to provide written notice to the City of Ottawa.
How Long Does the Process Take?
Arguing over contributory negligence can add extra time to settlement negotiations, as the insurance company will thoroughly investigate your actions. ⌖ After you file your Statement of Claim within the mandatory two-year limitation period, it typically takes 2 to 3 years to negotiate a final settlement. If a compromise on the percentage of fault cannot be reached, a judge at the Superior Court of Justice will ultimately decide the split at a civil trial.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What if I was texting or looking at my phone when I slipped?
Being distracted by a cell phone is another very common form of contributory negligence. The insurance company will argue that you failed to keep a proper lookout for obvious hazards. This can further reduce your final settlement amount, but it does not completely eliminate the property owner’s liability.
Does contributory negligence apply if I was intoxicated?
Yes. If you slip and fall outside an Ottawa bar or restaurant while intoxicated, the defence will heavily argue that your lack of coordination contributed to your injury. A judge may assign a high percentage of fault to you, drastically reducing your compensation.
Can the property owner blame their snow removal company?
Absolutely. Commercial landlords almost always hire third-party snowplough companies. Your lawyer will likely sue both the landlord and the contractor, and their respective insurance companies will fight each other over who was contractually responsible for salting the ice.
What if the property owner claims the storm was still actively happening?
Ontario courts generally recognize that property owners cannot reasonably clear snow while a massive blizzard is actively dropping heavy accumulation. However, once the storm stops, they are expected to clear the hazard within a “reasonable” amount of time, depending on the commercial nature of the property.
Leave a Reply